[Dust2Glory]

Title says it all... what's the difference? Is it the working times?

[Asphalt Rocket]

yes...

[BlueZero]

If I remember correctly working times and M105 will finish down a little better.

[Dust2Glory]

Originally Posted by Asphalt Rocket

yes...

Care to elaborate??

[Mindflux]

Technically the 95 has a longer working time where the 105 finishes finer. The M95 supposedly (AFAIK) doesn't have diminishing abrasives in it, where as the M105 does. I could have that reversed for all I remember but I know Superbee if he ever chimes in has extensive hands on with both of these.

I'm still awaiting to use my M95 sample I got... so I can't comment on it's actual function.

[Deep Gloss Auto Salon]

Originally Posted by Mindflux

Technically the 95 has a longer working time where the 105 finishes finer. The M95 supposedly (AFAIK) doesn't have diminishing abrasives in it, where as the M105 does. I could have that reversed for all I remember but I know Superbee if he ever chimes in has extensive hands on with both of these.

I'm still awaiting to use my M95 sample I got... so I can't comment on it's actual function.

I have never used 95 but it is M105 that does NOT have diminishing abrasives

[Dust2Glory]

So i know M105 is not that great with a foam pad, but is M95 any better?

[Deep Gloss Auto Salon]

Originally Posted by Dust2Glory

So i know M105 is not that great with a foam pad, but is M95 any better?

Just get some wool and M105 and call it a day... you wont be sorry!!

I really like the edge wool and 3M wool.....

[D&D Auto Detailing]

M105 works fine with foam, theres just a bit of a learning curve.

[Asphalt Rocket]

it does but nowhere near as well. Remeber when using wool it also levels the paint better therefore the end results will be better than using foam to start out with. Sorry about that Dust, should have been a little more indepth but the above post are pretty much dead on.