Quote:
Originally Posted by weesped
errrr...humm...the canon is a 10-22. i should know i use it  . good lens pick any ways |
yes that's correct sorry Cannon is 10-22mm thank you
, how do you like the Cannon weesped? I'd like your honest opinion about the Cannon please
Quote:
Originally Posted by tod071
Congrat Nica on the new lens. I'm sure you'll be happy with it as many people use it with no problems. I think there was only 1 lens that was better, the Tokina because of the fixed aperture, f/4 IIRC. Otherwise, the Canon 10-22, Sigma 10-20, Tokina 12-24, and Tamron 11-17 were very similar.
Now you don't have to stand so far away from the cars to take great pics huh!  |
Oooh thanks for the tip there tod, I saw there Tokina but the two people I consulted (co-worker who's a hard core photographer and my other friend who takes photos for a living) suggested I either go with Cannon or Sigma, well to start they suggested that as my skills progress I try other lens out too. Man I read so many reviews, I'm just glad Google exists lol. Thank you for the tip though and yes I'm looking forward to not standing so fara way from the vehicle and being able to capture more with this lens
Just curious tod, have you used the Tokina or the Tamron? I honestly didn not read anythign up on those lens? Any info would be greatly appreciated
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianja
Congrats!
10-20mm is wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide. I have been meaning to pick something up in that focal length range. Let us know how you like it.
The B+W MRC circular polarizer is a good choice. It is what I use. I have three different sizes.
Be sure you test the polarizer on the 10-20 at its widest before you purchase. From what I have read, on very wide angle lenses the lens can wind up seeing your polarizer if it is a standard model (it is too thick). As a result you get darkness at the edges of the photo.
This may not be a problem for your combination of lens/camera, but its worth a check. If it is a problem you will have to get a "slim" polarizer. It is exactly the same, but much thinner and without threads on the front for other filters (or lens caps).
Looking forward to some shots with your new glass!
|
Thank you brianja, yes I was warned about the polarizer and the wide angle lens. The polarizer I used worked just fine with the Sigma lens but that's why I didn't purhcase it right there and then becuase I wanted to read up a bit more on it. I didn't ask to see the slim polarizer though and I've been doing a bit of reading on them and I think your right, with the Sigma 10-20mm and the B+W MRC circular polarizer I don't think I'll have any issues but I'm getting second opinions.
I can't wait to snap some pictures of the Volvo with this lens
Quote:
Originally Posted by pirex
Is this what we call a fisheye lens? I can`t find something similar for my Nikon  |
Well same idea as a fisheye lens pirex, just with out the distortion that's all, well there will be some distortion but not as bad as a fisheye. I know Nikon has one I just can't remember the model or specs....
...I read a review about it actually...I'll check the magazine I got...I know I read it
04-16-2008, 05:56 AM
oooh but I took some pictures 
very much appreciated.
Linear Mode
